Sir Robert Buckland leads Amess review

24 Mar 2026News

Sir Robert Buckland KC is appointed to lead a review into the circumstances surrounding Sir David Amess's murder

Sir Robert Buckland KC has been appointed to lead an independent review to explore any missed opportunities that could have prevented the murder of Sir David Amess. The Home Secretary has made this appointment, recognising Buckland's distinguished legal background, having served as Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice, and Solicitor General for England and Wales. In his new role, Sir Robert aims to meet with the Amess family to establish the review's terms of reference.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood emphasised the significance of Sir David Amess's legacy, stating that "Sir David Amess was a hugely respected parliamentarian, who served his constituents and country with distinction. His tragic murder casts a long shadow over all of us who serve as MPs." Mahmood expressed admiration for the resilience shown by the Amess family during this difficult time, while also highlighting Buckland’s capabilities as an eminent legal mind who can help provide the family with answers.

In response to his appointment, Sir Robert Buckland KC reflected on the profound impact the murder had on the nation, saying that "The horrific murder of Sir David Amess in October 2021 shook the entire nation." He noted the personal significance of the case, stating, "As someone who, like Sir David, held regular open surgeries in my constituency, and who had known and worked with him in Parliament for over a decade, it made a deep and profound personal impact that lives with me to this day."

Buckland has accepted the role to ensure that "everything possible is done to fully identify the facts and circumstances that led up to this outrage," acknowledging the desire for clarity from Sir David's family and those invested in the health of parliamentary democracy. While the specific details of the review are still to be confirmed, it is anticipated that the terms of reference will address the unanswered questions the Amess family has regarding the circumstances surrounding the murder.

The review will leverage existing materials from the trial of Sir David’s murderer, as well as previous reviews including the initial Prevent learning review and the Independent Prevent Commissioner’s review published in July 2025. As the process unfolds, further details regarding the review's terms of reference will be made available to the public.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Supreme Court tightens the reins on opt-out collective proceedings in Evans

The Supreme Court’s decision in Evans v Barclays recalibrates the balance between access to justice and procedural fairness, reinforcing the CAT’s discretion to refuse opt-out certification where claims are weak and opt-in proceedings remain viable

Digital Property law risks overreach after 2025 Act

Recent case law on virtual assets reveals growing confusion over rivalrousness and risks stretching property law beyond coherence

ACL Netherlands v Sandelson: currency risk, interest and the Autonomy fraud aftermath

Currency fluctuations, settlement credits and pre-judgement interest following the landmark HP–Autonomy fraud litigation.

Crane Bank v DFCU Bank: High Court refuses late amendments to defence based on PwC reports

Court holds disputed amendments neither consequential nor adequately particularised, with trial prejudice decisive.

Hammond v Herrington Carmichael: when interim invoices become statute bills

Costs Judge Whalan rules on whether 29 solicitor invoices constituted interim statute bills — with significant consequences for assessment rights.

Justice Investments v Visalia Energia: security for costs, strike-out, and the limits of open justice

Security for costs ordered against an apparently impecunious claimant company where evidence of beneficial ownership and control was opaque and incomplete.

Dhillon v Orchard: Court of Appeal rules section 26 FSMA rights cannot bind successors in title

Rights of recovery under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 do not extend to third-party purchasers of property.

Ranpariya v Government of India: High Court grants partial permission in complex extradition appeal

Extradition appeal raises significant questions on particularisation, torture risk, and the reliability of Indian diplomatic assurances.

KD v Home Secretary: Court of Appeal overturns asylum ruling for convicted murderer

A Turkish national who killed his wife cannot rely on the Refugee Convention due to danger to the community.

Tooley v Times Media: court refuses injunction and Norwich Pharmacal order in privacy and defamation dispute

The High Court declines interim relief and source disclosure in a case involving a private video.

Tooley v Associated Newspapers: limitation, relief from sanctions and the protection of journalistic sources

A claimant pursuing defamation claims against two national publishers secures a partial reprieve — but loses her primary action on limitation grounds.

British Airways faces scrutiny over climate claims

The UK's climate action group Possible has prompted an investigation into British Airways' misleading carbon emissions statements regarding its sustainability efforts

Gardner Aerospace v Upton: director found in breach after lobbying against his own company's transaction

A CFO-turned-interim CEO covertly undermined a £35m refinancing deal to engineer his own re-employment.

Sousou Connect Limited v Abel: oral capital introduction agreements and the limits of quantum meruit

A High Court ruling dismisses a €1.5 million claim for capital introduction fees, finding no concluded oral agreement.

SJ Interview: Keith Froud

Keith Froud, Global Co-CEO and International Chief Executive of Eversheds Sutherland, has spent over three decades in corporate M&A before moving into global leadership. In this interview, he reflects on deal strategy, decision-making in complex organisations, the evolution of the international legal market, and the impact of technological change on the profession

Power Shifts, Responsibility Holds

From AI liability and freezing injunctions to private equity governance and regulatory reform, this issue traces a legal system adapting to new pressures while keeping accountability firmly human.