No Brexit without parliament

Riccardo Calzavara and Toby Vanhegan consider the reasoning behind the High Court’s ruling that the government cannot trigger article 50 without parliament’s consent

04 Nov 2016

Last month we summarised the arguments before the High Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. Judgment was handed down on 3 November 2016: [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). It was a bombshell.

The parties having agreed that the matter was justiciable and the court recognising that the referendum result was a matter of significance to be considered ‘elsewhere’, the sole question was whether the government was entitled to use the royal prerogative to give notice under article 50 for the UK to cease to be a member of the EU. The court was at pains to emphasi...

Want to read on?

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content

Single User

  • - 10 issues a year delivered to you
  • - Digital edition of the magazine
  • - Access to premium content
  • - Access to the SJ Archives
  • - Weekly email newsletter
  • - Access to the SJ community online
  • - Advanced search feature
  • - Online support
  • - Access to SJ app- coming soon!
  • - 6 special focuses per year
  • - Special offers on SJ and IICJ events

Corporate User

The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.

To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on